The Exchange Ater Exchange has also returned the users after the price allowed the glitch to send an XPL contract to rise and delete the positions.
Related Reading
According to reports, the price of the contract mark has been briefly limited from September 25, 2025, jump from $ 1.30 to approximately $ 4 in the area while XPL stayed near $ 1.30. The Mismatch has compounded a major stage release.
Ater problems are returned back
According to Ater’s Public messages and tracking reports, the exchange moved quickly to cover loss. Refunds were payable in USDT on accounts that were attacked by unusual movement. Second payment cycle covered by trading and cash-term.
One analysis puts the complete refund for about $ 16.6 million, though the statistics vary from sources. Reports means multiple stakeholders get compensated within the incident hours accepted.
The Xpl Perp incident is now fully moved. All affected users have received a reinstatement to USDT on their accounts.
We appreciate your patience and understanding in all this process. For more questions, please send a ticket with …
– Ater (@aster_dex) September 26, 2025
Invalid indicator and Cap Settings
Based on reports, the basic problem was the default error tied to a contract contract and cap cap. The Index had hard codes for $ 1 during the pre-Token Signature, and price marks near $ 1.22 was located in exchange disconnect.
Tldr in Ater $ XPL Status:
> Index price is defeated by $ 1
> Mark prices were tied for $ 1.22
> When they delete the capThis was the result of gross neglect in exchange. Nothing is exploiting / etc. Pic.Twitter.com/hcDj2brevua1
– Guthix 🫵 (@GuthelxHl) September 25, 2025
That CAP was raised before the indicator is repaired, allows the Ater’s marker to run in external market prices. As a result, positions were placed at the platform even though the broad market has shown that we are not like the same space.
This event has left the stabbed to other merchants. Liquidiation loss and funds payable for multiple or short accounts for gaining power. Some users are reporting questions that lived in points in the marks of Margins and the history of trading.
At least one report revealed that ASTA reported all customer fees such as SAFA and that the internal internal appeal was promised.
Public responsiveness and additional steps
According to social media reports, the answer was divided. Some sellers recommend quick refund, explaining the action as a temporary confidence.
Related Reading
Some want strong testing and clear connections. Industrial Watchtower pointed to this incident as a reminder that both platforms are separated and combined can fail where index feeds, computers, or other safety change.
On-chain compliance and receipts for refunds is nominated as ways to ensure the refund completed.
ASTER’s hosting avoid users’ rebellion, but the incident highlights a simple point: a small code or mistakes can create a large amount of money.
Exchange may face new questions by testing, the checks before you do, and how quick protections can be.
Picture entered from Unscurcuch, chart from trade transaction
