Trump warns us that he will struggle for years if the Supreme Court strikes down the taxes

Arkansas Lt Governor Leslie Ruttleli discusses President Donald Trumps trade war with China this morning with Maria.
The president Donald Trump In an interview on Sunday, he said that if the Supreme Court rules that the tariffs were unconstitutional, the US will struggle economically for years.
Trump appeared on fox news'”Sunday morning is tomorrow“And he said that Gaza could be rebuilt as a “freedom area” that would be paid for by the wealth of the richest countries,” but warned that the Supreme Court’s decision to impose tariffs on it could damage the US economy for a long time.
“If we win the tax case, which we hope we will, it’s important to our country’s interests. We’re the richest country out there.
The President said that his threat to impose a tariff of 200% helped to stop the war between India and Pakistan, and also when the tariff rates of the leading companies of reason, chips and other products are at risk.
Trump is taking a historic look at the Supreme Court’s beliefs
President Donald Trump said the US would struggle economically for years if the Supreme Court struck down his tariffs as illegal. (Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images / Getty Images)
“Pharmaceuticals are coming back, so are tariffs. So basically, I’m putting tariffs on pharmaceuticals unless they’re made here. Everything’s coming back,” he said.
“CHIPS – I put Big taxes For chips, unless they’re made here – there’s no fee if they make them here, and all those companies are coming back from Taiwan, they’re coming back from all over the world, and they’re coming back quickly,” they added.
The President said that the US will have brought in $17 trillion in investment in the first eight months of his term and it could be $20 trillion by the end of his first year, saying that this is happening. “
Fed President warns inflation ‘is not as bad’ as tax concerns

Trump announced his “recovery” tax policy in April at an event he called “liberation day.” (Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images / Getty Images)
“We’re building the biggest country in the world, much bigger than we’ve ever done before. But we have a big decision and that decision is coming to Supreme Court” said the President.
“This is being fought by left-wing lunatics who have left me without knowing what they are doing and the people who represent the countries of other countries who have sacrificed for us for years,” said Trump, who is challenging the actions of his administration.
We small businesses Those affected by the fee brought lawsuits challenging Trump’s tax administration that brought executive action claims under the International Emergencies Act (ieeesta), which executive actions allow the President to approve tax rates.
The Federal District Court and the Court of Appeals rejected that argument, ruling that the President exceeded his legal authority by placing the fee under Ieeeeenca and moved the administration to the Supreme Court.
Fed’s Miran Glowerplays Trump’s tax impact on growth, deflation

Tariffs on imported goods are paid by importers, who often pass on higher costs to consumers at higher prices. (Qian Weizhong / VCG via Getty Images / Getty Images)
“Tariffs have been used against the United States for years,” Trump said. “And it would always worry me a lot, I would look and I would see, I would say how can they allow this to happen in our car country because we didn’t spend money.”
The President said he did not think of a back-up plan in case the high court overruled his Tax regime.
“I’m going to have to find something. I don’t even want to think about it. We’re doing well to think about it,” Trump said. “If that happened, we would have to pay the money. So if something were to happen with that, that would mean that they would be allowed to use the tax rates, and if they were on national security – then they would take away our tax security.”
Find FOX business on the go by clicking here
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the consolidated funding case, known as Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump v. Selection of VOS, INCON. 5.