The purpose of the critics is not well understood

By Robert Scucci | Published 3 seconds ago

The film criticism and talking about Media General is a dirty job, but not for a reason to think. The most common thing I encounter is a way of responding to the fans, where the students seem to be blinded by another known person.

Basically, that’s all critics film do: They set up their taste for their body. Verbose is more and increased criticism, which is better for an indicator of the indicator you receive. It is up to the sorting of your tastes more critics that they say. Film criticism – with all criticism, really – isn’t the emperor, in the barometer.

Preferred preferred and requires consideration

In this regard, I have produced more than 1,400 articles with a big freakin robot. Most of this is reviewed by donating my tausing on the media I eat. If you are new, you can imagine that I am an idiot because I want to be called a bad cinema in chronic inquiry of redemption.

Of course, I wonder about what I see, and I share what I found with anyone who wishes to check my test. I will not call on one of the biggest critics of our time, but I have founded my taste, and that is the whole point.

All critics worked in this way. They have difficult and unpleasant loves, and they use that context to help students understand whether they would love them or don’t like something.

Roger Eber was hard but good in this context

Roger Enter is a unique example of what critics do. He gave his life in writing what you love and joined his audience. Classic Script lover, wonderful films in Eberert Her girl on Friday, Raising the Child, A young woman, What’s up, Doc?besides Happened one night For a character-driven, smart, and supported by a good-set gags of the narrative.

At the same time, he punished openly weaker efforts, Launching the films like Bio-Dome, French kisses, Tommy Boybesides Freddy Was. If you are a lover of those movies, it does not mean that critics are like An iberty hate you personally or think less about yourself by getting fun of them. His indicator’s outline still offers important insight. If he hates Tommy Boy With its extra slapstick and leading, and it’s exactly the kind of media you want, you can safely think your kind of movie based on her negative review.

And that praised him Major Payne They have a lot of meaning. He gave Damon jokes to 4 jokes, wrote: “The key to the jokes is to travel about it, and heans created a successful comic, especially when he accepted the call.” Kebert’s context in the Modern Screwball modern joke, the fact that Major Payne He overcame him.

The critics have the blind spots

Critics have the same blind things for everyone like that. Trip to the rotten tomatoes for good examination Five nights in Freddy’s proves this. With 33 sensitive points and 86 percent of the audience points, you thought that the reviewers could not release the motives without cause.

Why is separated? Five nights in Freddy’s Designed back in a lot of lore from video game, trying to adapt, that the ordinary fans will not understand. The critics knocked this film overloading Easter eggs and indicators divided into regular audience.

The game series of the game are very happy to see this information on the screen. That doesn’t make a movie good or bad; Just makes a niche. The critics did not find, but fans did, and that’s all you need to know.

Use their judgment To … to open your ideas

The whole point of critics to build preferences to filter IP quality through their taste. If you know the taste of criticism well enough, you can use your sharpening.