The laws of the ICJ fails to fight climate change can break international law
If the country Failure to take a deciding action to protect the planet in climate change, may be to violate international law and considered harm caused by the personality. This is one of the conclusions of the vision of unprecedented vision issued by the international justice court (ICJ) in national legislation in the face of the environmental problem.
15 Judges who make up the ICJ, the highest judgment of the United Nations, has described the need to deal with the climate change ‘as an emergency.’ Nightly, they decided that signs to various international agreements may violate international law if they do not approve ways to reduce greenhouse gas. The decision says that the “clean and healthy place” builds a person’s right. This interpretation suggests weather controversy than the environmental or economic environment, putting you as a problem for justice and basic rights.
The Shift in Focert can be very influenced by international laws and the trial, making it easy to hold the uncleanness of responding to the environment. Since this year, according to the recent report from Grantham research on Climate from Climate Change and Nature in London, there were about 26,967 new cases in the 2024 new charges.
Yuju Wasawa, The President of the ICJ, clarified that this was a counseling vision, not a binding decision. However, he pointed out that the court hoped that the announcement was’ we will inform and guide social and political work to address the problems of the weather. “
The case leading to this idea is from Vanuatu, the Pacific Island’s population is at high risk of climate change. Later, Ralph Regenvanu, the Minister of a Fire changed, filed a formal complaint with ICJ. In 2023, the UN general meeting of the UN was legalized the request for a counseling vision.
The judges answer two important questions: What international obligations under international law is to protect the weather system and the environment from the outfit of greenhouse gases? And what legal consequences in the lands, by the verb or active, causes serious weather damage, especially in relation to the vulnerable world of the island and future generations?
Court analysis is considered provisions of international agreements such as United Nations Charter, the Universal Human Rights Declaration, Paris, Kyoto ProtoCtion of the Weather, Among others.
The ICJ tests concluded that the provinces have a job, “working with proper acting and using all the methods you have,” blocking tasks under their law or control from the environment affecting the environment.
