Google emphasized you that its search results were issued AI and summaries in fact they do not harm the traffic publishers. Publishers disagree, and at least one is willing to go to court to prove the injury caused by Google to. The Penska Media Media, Parent’s Company and the Hollywood journalist, Google on Friday Friday swims and finally reduce the process of its publication.
Panke controversy: By showing a summary of AI on top of the page over Google Overview Panel, which leads to its electronic article, either for advertisements or subscriptions. The search engine, the company contradicts, using its monopoly by seeking to make publishers stop their content next to those.
Well, Penske says that in recent years, Google has given us the publishers basically no choice without access to its content. The case is now Google now shows a website only, making it available to be visible to Google permission to use that content for other purposes, such as the summary of AI. If you think you are losing the road without going to Google, imagine how bad it would seem to appear at all.
Google’s spokesman, Namusoco, said that the company was not in harmony with the claims. “With Ai Oversviews, people find the search helps very help and use you more, creating new opportunities to be available. We will protect these senseless claims.” Google’s spokesperson, Jose Castanada told Abeuters.
That was actually a company line as the rumbles of the traffic field starts. Last month, the company published a blog post when asked for the volume from the Google search results that have been “strong in a year” -weely without giving a meaningful “stable” meaning. The company also makes a case that “Click Quality” has increased, so people click through more time on the sites send to it.
That doesn’t match with what publishers say they see. DMG media, Daily Mail owner, they are looking for clicks on 89% from AI redemption Wall Street Journal from the beginning of the Business Insider, Washington Post, and Huffpost was reported all reported roads. The PEW study also found that the people do not click the most often when Ai Overview is available, to find that people are given search results without summary of twice those who see the result made by Ai.
Just kick, if you ask Google Gemini if your Google AI views have led to a minimum number of publishers, several studies and anecdotal reports from publishers suggest the negative impact on traffic. “It would be fun to ask Google,” Do you lie about the impact of Ai Overview on Traffic, or is your AI helpline offer false and honest information? “
_.png "The best coffee of mushrooms, wired tested and updated (2025)")