Prime Minister of Female sexual assaults of women who work with women, the court receives

The security guard was taken unfairly and captured his workmates without their permission, emerged.

Content Warning: This article discusses critical articles, including sexual violence.

The security guard said to the Premier touched women in the closest areas, the decision of the registration of the State Tribunal is depicted on Sunday.

The security guard served during Prime Minister Bennett’s policies and Yair Lapid, respectively. Bennett-Lapid government was in power from June 2021 until December 2022.

The authorities presented the investigation after a employee reported that the guard drank him during the workers team. In addition to the incident, criminal cases were started.

On August 13, the court sentenced a security guard, in 30 years, after he rejected non-labor actions. Four women at first filed complaints; However, two refused to witness, leaving two complains in the case.

The main complainant came forward for about six months after events. He confirmed that during a group of workers held on the roof, he saw tormenting him from guards to him.

“You filter me in bed,” he said, explaining the emotional stress on the law. He also proved that about three months later, he continued to harass him, saying: “He put the stick in my chest.”

PM monitors also affect employees without permission

According to the court’s decision, the guard concerned the workforce without their consent in their oil, buttons and thighs. The investigation started following and later it began to be in the community, eventually led to the discussion of security guards.

While the court saw that more charges were opened. The prosecutor had asked for 12-year-old work in his work in the Office of the Premier, but the court ruled for five years from office and additional five consequences for any role in the public service.

During the trial, a security officer in a residence involved the counter-evidence evidence.

“There is a person who looks at 24/7 cameras; there is no blind place, everything is painted; it is impossible for this to happen.”

My Merav, the lawyer representing a security guard, said the laws was the elimination of each complainant to charge the guard.

“This is a vicious structure established by one employee who was trying to rent other workers to support the prominent worker wanted to remove it,” Zamir said. “Two of them refused cooperation and testified that there was no time, and as a result the court was forced to find two charges.”

He continues to say that the complainant was lacking and reasonable.

“The case was evident in a lack of evidence and unfaithful evidence that did not agree with a sense or common. We have proved that this site was protected and blind,” he said.

“His conviction is a result of the apartheid court that followed his” sores in the position of trial in court, the prosecutor would continue to proclaim his chastity at every opportunity. “