La County is asking a court to block the release of thousands of Deputy Photos

Los Angeles County is trying to prevent a reporter from obtaining the names and photos of nearly 8,500 deputies and other sworn employees employed by the Sheriff’s department.

Public records legal dispute centers filled in April 2023 by Cerise Castle, freelance reporter. Castle, who asked county officials to release the names and official heads of all deputies not working undercover, was fired last summer after his California open records law was denied.

The castle stated that releasing the images would increase transparency and improve the public’s knowledge of law enforcement work.

The department told the court that the photos are not public records and that they “do not seriously examine the conduct of a public business.”

La County Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant rejected the County’s position, writing in a July ruling that its attorneys ‘confused the general public’s lack of access …

The County also added that personal privacy, “personal safety and effectiveness in their roles” could be harmed by the release of the images.

Castle’s battle with the Sheriff’s Department revealed a similar case involving the Los Angeles Police FREE POROCIL photos. In 2022, the journalist ben camacho and the group of activists STOP STOP CLIPPORS sent photos of the Department and other information about the Lapd Officials, who sent them to the Internet in an instant database to watch the guards.

Details that caused a furor within the lapd, which led to the city not quite succeeding in the attempt to recover the images. Some officials filed a lawsuit saying that they were put at risk of release because they worked diligently.

In response to questions about Castle’s case, the Sheriff’s Department released a statement saying they are “very concerned” about the hope of freeing thousands of Deputies.

“Such a broad application threatens the privacy and security of the deputy in an era of advanced technology and artificial intelligence,” the statement said. “Furthermore, such disclosures put operations at risk, demoralize Vice Recruiting amid recruiting challenges across the country, and undermine efforts to protect our communities.”

In his July decision, Chalfant directed La County to release the heads with the caveat that any newly appointed deputies not consent to the release of their photographs.

The judge wrote that the district had not demonstrated “safety concerns about any particular officer,” adding that “clear problems do not eliminate a particular risk” to certain officers.

Castle is best known for his cover for a so-called criminal deputy with the Sheriff’s department. Brash and Premipen at times, he has a huge social media following and was previously featured on Vice News and NPR before going overboard.

It said the castle in the debate and the County’s contentious times of the photo withholding do not meet the standard under the federal law. “

“They don’t come up with any real arguments,” he said. “All these are speculations and hypothetical situations that will not happen.”

Castle also worked with the Progressive News Site ContL La, as did camacho when he found the photos of the lapd officer who was watching the database.

The two journalists are currently involved in the anti-game side of GRAIR GAME LA, the non-profit organization that founded Knock La. They have sued for nearly $5 million, claiming the organization unfairly destroyed their work.

The Ground Game La accused the journalists of trying to take control of the site, saying they took it unfairly and used their name, mailing list and other things.

Castle’s approach to obtaining Deputy Images hit a ship bump this month with the California 2nd District Court of Appeal. The High Court decision in Castle’s Favoritism was temporarily suspended pending a review by a panel of three senior Jews.

The castle has proposed in a recent Court review the release of the images [in] Shooting, misbehavior and gang support. “

Susan Seager, an attorney for the denial, said there was no good reason for the images to be blocked.

“We think they just don’t want the public to hold them accountable,” said the beach. “They don’t want the public to know what they’re doing.”

Calle said that his case goes beyond the yard, given the ongoing attacks on La County Agents wearing face coverings and the increased use of facial technology and greater expertise to threaten the privacy of citizens.

“Currently we are in a situation where we see masked agents tearing people from the street and from their families, I think these laws are very effective,” he said.