In fact, AI in the search charges many questions and high click of high quality

Last month, the PEW Research Center Shevelel report on the View of Ai Overview’s Effect on Web publication. In short, analysis produced an expensive view to anyone who relies on a web traffic. But on Wednesday, Google Search Head Liz RID wrote about a blog post that puts a different spin on things. Google VP says traffic from searching for “stability” websites and that quality clicks are broken.

REID attacks The kidney Everything is Peaisy, and AI makes things better – even for websites! Has written an organic volume of the Google Organic Search Click on websites “be the case” with a strong year for a year. Reid also sought Google sends some “clicks of clicking” (slow visitors immediately) on websites without the previous year. The company says people are very happy with the search experience.

The company did not share the numbers – the post containing anything – to support its claims.

Description of Google to a strong idea? “With Ai Overnviews, people want more and ask new questions that often become a long and sophisticated place,” rewritten. “In addition, with Ai Oveviews, people see many links on the page than before. Many questions and links mean many opportunities to look and click.”

Reid highlights a changing place. It says user training resulted in lower variabling and increasing the traffic cover. Of course, Google Search head did not call some websites. But says the forums, videos, podcasts and posts “with real words and first ideas” is flourishing. Reid added that the content like “a deep review, original post, a unique view, or the first reasoning analysis” do well.

Google VP said people want easy types of Q & A depend on a lot from AI. “Other questions where people seek a quick response, such as ‘a month full,’ people can not be filled with the first AI overviews and not click,” rewritten. “This has been the case with other fees where we have added, such as a graph of information or many sports. But people try to be deeper, and they want to buy more, and where they do, this click is very important.”

It is variation from the PEW report. It was found that visitors saw AI and clicked the traditional native effect on eight percent of all visits. Those without a summary of AI? They clicked on the traditional effect on 15 percent of their visit. As for those source links in the cloud of AI? Pow found that only some percent of the people were clicked on those. Users may also complete their browsing after visiting the page with AI summary.

That is aligned with the Photo Commentffflare CEO Mattather Prince made in June. He said the transportation of a fire on the search retained constipation. “Web future will be as ai more, and that means that people will be reading your content summaries, not the content of the original,” he said. Prince said ten years ago, Google sent a visitor to a visitor for all two harsh pages. Earlier this year, dropped on one visit to all six pages. He said that, in June, there was less than one of all 18.

I can’t tell you who believe. But here is the final source that had to say: