Tech News

Cornado Cosh Roman Storm developer with one count in Federal Crypto Case

“Seeking to donate Tormado Cash Service

In the trial, prosecutors presented evidence that they prove that Tornado Cash was made for money laundering from the beginning. Their Witnesses included a boosted victim in Tornado Cash – although this account is being running online for prominent members in the Crypto – and a guilty fraud that uses a profit. The “bathing, bathing,” a cheat is said to write to his girlfriend, in the text about Tornado Cash.

When the government closes their case last week, prosecutors dismissed the privacy of the privacy as a good distraction. “The real money was not called ‘privacy” for ordinary people, “Benjamin Gain Tues, one of the persecutors, was quoted. “It was hiding a dirty money for criminals.”

The storm and other developers till they even wear Torronado’s product

Storm’s lawyers, for now, they want to argue that although their customer has established technologies that are bullying by bad actors, he had not participated in any case or any dirty money. “You will never hear evidence that Romans or a [other] Coffounds participated in any hacks, “said Kerri Curtis Axel, a partner in the Waymaker law and the advice of stormy, in his opening words.

The storm had no power to prevent the abuse of Tornado, was reported that the defense became objection, since he and other engineers have reduced converting power or disables low code.

This defense was said in the Stave several Witnesses who speak of the official official use of Tornado Cash. But the storm witnessing us, which could open her to testing by preventing the prosecutor.

Eventually, despite a storm with a guilty transmission of a small transaction, the Jury accepted a defense mechanism.

Mark write down a child, “Mark Bini, partner at the Law firm in Smith’s Crypto Crypto and the cyclone.”

The storm now waiting for a sentence, often occurring within a few months after being convinced. At that time, the Doj must decide if it will try to resume the financing of the money when the jury could not agree on.

“The government can choose to return to the storm, but are based on the notes from Jury, expecting them to go based on verification based on the guarantee,” said Bini. “While they may have argued with a difficult sentence, the Jury decision seems to take a lot of money without government charge.”

Update at 8/06/25 at 3:32 PM: This article is updated with a statement from the Green Matthew, a Witness specialist.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button