Agreement or no fee, Mark Carney must treat new relations with the United States

The week after the latest deadline resolved the Donald Trump launched in Canada – and the Canadian managers now look forward to the full revival of Canada – US-Mexico – many things remain unclear.

But when Mark Carney addressed journalists in the British Columbia journalists on Tuesday, he expressed the clarity of one thing.

“While working with the United States for many beneficial opportunities for trade and investment,” it is clear that we cannot count, or relieve that our most important trade relationships, through our prosperity. “

Such comments follow from Canney’s emphasis on March That “the old relationship” of Canada and the United States “ended.” And it always surprises that the Prime Minister talked about this big trade partner and a close friend, Cenada spend a great deal.

But also it is too difficult to argue.

“And that is why,” Carney continued on Tuesday, “We are focusing on building our dominance at home and has new opportunities for Canada and employees across the people.”

He is obviously to be judged clearly judged by how they go with the current conflict. But a deal or no money – tax rates or no money

What does the ‘deal’ look like with trump?

Somehow, Canada’s moment of difficulty seems to postpone the past few months.

Trump talks a little bit about Annex Canada. Some of his taxes have come to be less than he had intimidated. And the shipment of Canada, in general, addressing the low level of taxes than many other countries.

But there is still tax rates. The active tax value displayed by the United States in entering now Estimated to be 18 %.6 percent – very high since 1933. In Canada, an active amount is estimated to be 13 percent.

“You have to think about the Trump Register as second of the 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff, successfully restored the results of 90 years of freedom,” economicist Paul Krugman writing this week.

By arguing with the guess that Trump was using tax prices as a plan of negotiations, he made a tax “deals” as the other countries. It seems that he is willing to accept the risk of the United States and additional costs that will be placed in American homes, saying nothing about the relationship between the United States and other countries.

“The US is in the process of changing its commercial relationships,” Carney said. “In a series of agreements, the charger is available, the charger access to its economy in the Unilateral Trade Liberalization and the new investment commitment in the United States.”

The Conservative Pierre Viiliever leader tried to blame Carney this week with an American rates and suspected the prime minister “back” to make an agreement to the US President. He also said the purpose should be “accessible in an unexpected market in the US market.”

Several comments are a reminder to how much Carney can have a stake in current conversations and future discussions – although the Canada is expecting from Carney in this situation.

Of course, whether Carney’s government is able to come to a contract with the Trump administration, existing evidence that provides that the agreement changes. Similarly, now it would seem unpleasant to think that some previous detail – 2016 will return when or when Trump is not president.

Is the time of the third option?

Pressure and drafting of Canadian relationship in the United States is one of the most powerful in Canadian history. But the current moment you can have something in common When the Canada found them briefly in 1972.

Over the last five-three years, Mitchell is sharp, and wrote outside newspaper, he put his name on a 24-page paper, Canadian-US Relations: Options for Future. Against the accidents of the global cracks, an economic and cultural canada freedom with the A series of sudden transportation by American stewardsThe sharp redemption is that Canada had three options.

First, Canada can continue the situation, manage its relationship with the United States on the basis of the case and the foundation and dealing with problems as they appear. Second, in Canada ‘may’ go to deliberately travel in the United States, “can be a free trade agreement.

Watch | Former NL prime minister with Carney’s approach:

Canney’s Soptivations method in US trading conversations, ‘said unl nl

Andrew Furey, Newfoundand and Labrador Premier, says the ‘sound “way to negotiate with the United States’ in a calm, canadian.’ This comes as the US President Donald Trump began to incorporate high-import tax priorities on Thursday.

While sharpness was in the third situation, the people of Canadians, under a different government, eventually walked the second course. And it was called “The third option“He entered something exposed, accompanied by the Economic Interchange of Pierre Trudeau and the destructive training of young commerce partners.

There is no evidence that Carney has taken any inspiration from a third option. But Sharp’s Shall explanation reads somewhat as a means of saying “Canada Strong” – the campaign of the Library Campaign Slogan in spring election. (Thereafter, perhaps broadly in line with the meaning of Polievre for the need to strengthen the Canadian economy.)

In Recent ExpansionHis paper helped to support the support that promoted the cultural facilities in Canada, but “did not … bring any change in our trading guidance.” And while “the internal reconstruction of Canada’s internal reconstruction to reduce our dependency in the United States” that was “tried and maybe it was too difficult to achieve the Federal and Provincial Government.”

In Canada, separation of trade fits as one of these, if it was easy to do, someone else did now. Indeed, Pierre Trudeau’s government’s efforts to build bridges in new markets can be considered as a “Red-Feed Government” in Canada-US Relationships in St. Francis Xavier University.

In a better carney crossing, McKercher said, because the Canada now works with many comprehensive free trading agreements with partners across the United States.

“When the rubber will strike the road to enable Canadians, especially small and medium enterprises, business links and actually spend money on these trading agreements,” McKercher said.

“If I were a Carney government, if I could learn something from the third test, especially in classification, I would actually make a great effort by linking Canada and other businesses and organizations.”

It may be necessary to have reality by what happened. Even if sharpness is allowed that “the United States will likely remain a more important market in Canada and the source of the highest line.” The third election, he wrote, not only referred to as “reducing Canadian dangers, especially in relation to the United States.”

But in 1972, that was just a way. In 2025, there may be a need.