After 100 years of Quantum Mechanics, Physicists are still unable to agree on anything
July 1925 – Last years – the attitude and the Werry Heisenberg life He wrote a letter Himself famous famous, Wolfgang Pauli. In it, Heisenberg agrees that “his opponents have been very late on each passing day,” asks the fastest answer to Pauli in the attached manuscript they think “finish … or burn.”
That was Mdeutung (Paper redownment) paper, which lays the foundation for the more efficient version of the Quantum Mechanics. For that reason, scientists think MdeutungDate of Publishing Official Quantem Mechanics date. Remembering this 100 Monument, Kind Asked 1,101 scientific knowledge of the perfect field questions, reveal that, as in the past, the Quantum physics territory remains a hot bodily.
Published today, an interview indicates that natural science scholars rarely change their explanation of quantum mechanics and are often uncertain about their answers. They often see the eye on two points: that accurate, mathematical interpretation of Mechanics is important, and that, maybe, maybe, perhaps, maybe more will be replaced by the perfect opinion (75%). A total of 15,582 scholars, 1,101 of them, provides a survey at the Response of 7%. For 1,101, more than 100 respondents sent additional responses to the study questions.
‘GExBook’ method is a group, with caveat
Participants are asked to call their preferred measurement problem, long conundrum in the quantum of quantum in central quantum. NO FREE is clear from the elections given. Frontrunner, with 36%, was the definition of Copenhagen, where (Aurencil Worven were different from the classical, and the Quantum States received only buildings in the estimated classical realm regime.
It is good to note that the detectors of the Copenhagen translation references as a “reproduction and calculating” method. That is because it is often seen with Weedy details to find many practical things, which is, to be good, are really powerful in the quantum computing. However, in addition to the Tymonists who choose Copenhagen translation that they were not very faithful in their returns, avoiding following questions to ask them to understand them.
However, more than half of respondents, 64%, showed “the following” in several other ideas. This includes the methods designed for information (17%), Many countries (15%), and the Bohm-de Broglie Pilot Wave Theory (7%). At that time, 16% of respondents have imported written answers to all options, saying that we do not require definition, or grant them the best translation of the Quantum Mechanics.
Therefore, many such as many other efforts in Quantum Mechanics, you will have to see which sticks (or more, what doesn’t).
Separated results, Equipocal Review
Physics are discussing the results and evolution they had mixed feelings that the lack of contract is related to this. Elise Crug in the city of New York, for example, told the environment that emergency suggests that “people took a serious question.”
Experts in a philosopher and physics section of the philosophy. Tim MauldlinPhilosopher Philosopher New York University, told Gizdownow “I think the main takeaway from this is a clear-imaginary science – and did not hold firm ideas – about base problems with the quantum view,” notes Mrllin, a professor in high school.
By email in Gizmodo, Sean Carroll, the Moyorian of the woman in John Hopkins answer the survey, express the same concern. There are few factors can be after this lack of agreement, said, but there is a common idea that “no matter how to calculate the testing,” which is clearly wrong. “
“It would be reasonable if we thought it was in other ways to physics and had no prominent puzzles,” Carroll added a part of the survey group. “But no man thinks that.”
“It is simply a problem that we do not have a story about what reality is real,” Theoretical Physist, Physical Theory of New Mexico in Albuquerque participates in the study, in a natural report.
However, research results look like it is totally suggesting the standard belief in tThe importance of a solid basis of ideas, almost part of the participants acknowledges that The departments of the Physics is adequate for adequate quantum fashions. On the other hand, 58% of stakeholders responded that the test results will help to appreciate what the idea ends as “that.”
Schröer’s consistency, type of
Imprimoring or worse, the survey represents a happy, progressive field of the quaantum science-which, if you are following Our coverage, You can really find, It is really amazing. Description or sync is not really bad science – just a certain science of the future. After all, Quantum Mechanics, all its norms, remains One of the most certified assessment ideas in science history.
It is amazing to see how these scholars disagree with Quantum Mechanics, and yet they are giving strong support for supporting their ideas. Sometimes, no correct or bad answer – just different.
Your favorite lovers of love, I really recommend that you check A full report Through all the account that the environmental scholars were divided. You can also find the original survey, the method of way, and an anonymous version of all the answers at the end of the report.
And when you take a survey, or at least part of it, feel free to discuss your answers. Oh, and let me know if you believe Heisenberg should have been hot Mdeutung after all.
