Shiba Inu restored the transfer of bones to the Shibarium’s Plasma Bridge, re-energizing deposits and withdrawals between EnyeRreeum and the 2nd network following a security incident that forced a month-long hiatus. In the October 14 Post, core couninuer contributor kaal Dhairya wrote that “Plasma Bridge is back online with a bone, following a complete update and a series of security measures,” adding a safe, powerful, and robust experience. “
Shiba Inu plans the Shibarium Bridge
The relAunch comes after Shibarium’s bridge was restricted in mid-September after a key compromise that allowed a malicious exit from the POS bridge. On the day of the September 21 letter incident, Dhairya said that “on September 12, 2025 at 18:44 UTC, the power of unauthorized signatures was used to push the state of POS, which revoked many methods,” encouraging strict measures. The group said at the time that it will publish full technical details when it is safe to do so and that “binding continues to be prohibited during content / stability.”
The Shibarium group positions the reopened Shibarium Bridge as the first step in the recovery of service costs, supported by a new policy and operational management. The most noticeable change for users is the method of the mandatory delay before the completion withdrawal: “All Bone Plasma withdrawals include a completion delay and a defensive response.” The post represents the delay as strengthening guarantees of resistance to plasma fraud.
Another control introduced in the active address layer bridge is Blacklisting. According to the team, the new method “Allows Intrusion and blocks suspicious addresses from the bridge,” with the aim of preventing repeat abuse in the ecosystem. The Shiba Inu team also emphasizes that critical code changes receive external review: “All critical changes were reviewed by thousands, adding an independent layer of scrutiny.” relAunch followed a proven sequence that included unit testing, end-to-end rollout, deployment to the public TestNet (“Puppynet”), and “Multi-Timeframe” monitoring before production deployment.
The October 14 update also takes a closer look at a different part of the September incident involving a wristband and a small Oscar Token. The Shiba Inu group revealed that the attacker was “taken out and sold about $600 Oscar tokens from the bridge but neglected to recover the knen tokens,” which is now always documented. The group’s previously announced Bounty “has expired,” the group said, but it plans “one full, TBD (amount TBD) of complete recovery of all information held by addresses controlled by the attacker,” stressing that goals will only appear on verified channels.
While only the bone remains in the plasma bridge today, the shibarium signaled a wide road. The group plans to “re-energize the tokens” and finalize a fair and transparent payment framework for affected users, “with information to be published when doing so would not increase the risk. The post emphasizes the measured position behind the September door: “Safety first: We will not publish information that may be aniving works.”
The context around the moonrise emphasizes the magnitude of the expulsion behind the scenes. Towards the end of September, a detailed rotation of the Valida signatories, the migration of the contract control to the Hardware merdware, the reference to the reference, the live coordination and the exchange of the responding experts. The September 21st update also addresses a bug in the implementation of Validator rules
Meanwhile, the reopening restores a critical path for ruvingtors, liquidity providers and users who rely on the movement of bones between edereum and shibarium. As the post concludes, new protections – including the blacklist and windows of challenges of 7 days – are designed to harmonize the experience of the user of the bridge with effective conditions of use in conflicting situations, and yes – the goal of 7 days – shows the public. “
During the period, the shiba Inu (Shib) token was traded at $0.00001060.
The featured image is made with DALL.E, a chart from ChattingView.com
Planning process At Bitcoinist we focus on delivering well-researched, accurate, and unlimited content. We maintain strict sourcing standards, and each page receives diligent review by our team of senior technical experts and experienced editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
