Jimmy Kimmel is back in ABC this week. Type. About a quarter of the general audience of the audience could not see Talk Host Host this week after two of the two owners abc, Sitter’s and Nexstar, declined to carry the show. Those gossipers clearly felt that Kimmel joke – that covered some conflicting facts – it was not so tired that they could not expose their viewers to the alien. And they were the first organizations of pulling the plug in Kimmel, after the Federal Cirendan Commission chair seemed to threaten the action. That means even channels carrying this exhibition – and Disney, which belong to ABC – may fall in love with a government official who seems to be eager to use his power of peaceful critics.
CARR is powerful. FCC can also provide the broadcast licenses when channels do not use public interests. It is the time of the time when about 100 percent of viewers receive their shows in the air, on television. Local TV channels were given the limited spectrum fragments to measure their programs and had to meet certain standards to keep that privilege. But that period has passed. Local television stations are now reaching their audience or online audience. Also, networks are increasingly spreading their plans with apps. However, Carr is still the ability to be bullied networks and integrated organizations threatening to take their licenses.
This raises a question: What is the point of keeping the current system? It is certainly a disney confusion and with fellow network owners such as Comcast, ownership of the NBC, and Paramount, with CBS owners. Instead of kowtowing on the Recilotators of free movement, and the Best Movement Programs with ABC Programing, perhaps Disney should seek to shut down the stations. Disney has already been radio shows (which is a product) and its app. There are few examples of local channels held and working networks. What if Disney or Comecucucacy or ceekicacacy are reduced to cooperatives with problems and starts their local channels without using a spectrum-both as the apps and cable applications? Let NextA and Sinclair get their system, where he can adapt content to any way they want. Disney can pass through the excess of airwaves without worrying about FCC threats. They can also say that seven dirty words!
I have run this idea passed through a non-existent FCC commission, who showed some potential problems involving existing and such contracts. But in general, he acknowledged that the idea was unreasonable but he was Just to movewith the highest scale. “Which Disney is made by broadcasts in Espn and everything else. It’s something to die,” tell me, talking about the situation in anonymity. Blair Levn, who once was the chief of staff in the FCC chairman, was very sympathetic to my opinion. He says: “The distribution is a baldery of snow,” he said. It is only a question that it will take how long it will take. Five years? Ten?
So my opinion is a small veil than I thought. The Kimmel Conundrum is only in the heat in a chunk of frozen water. Although I was talking to former FCC officials, Adcham, a Media’s investment bank, issued a note that raised an extraordinary action. Disney, said, You must start spreading the whole schedule! The money would receive from advertisements or subscriptions are more than the loss of any losses, and the Disney’s Market CAP will increase.
I don’t expect that happen immediately. Multiyear contracts and ongoing relationships between the contacts and the key networks in the current situation for a while. But when I request a maximum company in company with TV channels whether the current arrangement has been invited you, I did not receive the pubback I expected. “The real question,” you tell me, to confess a late relationship has already been.
