I was not sure I was looking for anthropic that I had paid my books – I did now

A thousand million dollars It was not a condo that was a condo – but the mindset. At least I did for me when I heard that AI anthropic company had agreed At least $ 1.5 billion The authors and the publishers of their literature were used to train the original translation of its great tongues, Claude. This comes after the judge has set a summary judgment that they used the literature they used. The proposed agreement – continuing to be examined by the Wary judge – may be reported that they can give at least $ 3,000 authors. I’ve wrote eight and my wife has finished five. We speak dollars to update the bathrooms here!

As a place to live is based on pirated books, it is not true of the main problem of whether you are okay for AI companies to train their models in patents. But it is important that real money is involved. Earlier the controversy with Ai Copyright was based on legal, moral, and political. Now things of things are literally, when it’s time to deal with basic issue: As Elite Ai depends on the book content, is it appropriate that companies make up Trillion-dollar businesses without paying the authors?

In the law aside, I have been against this issue. But now as we get from Courthouse on Checkbook, the film has fallen in my eyes. I deserve those dollars! The authors paying themselves feel as something to do. Despite the power (including US president Donald Trump) contradicted another method.

Printing to print to freeze

Before I move forward, let me get rid of the whopper of the statement of self-releasing. As I said, I am the writer himself, and I stop or lose the consequences of this conflict. I am on the History and I am on the History of Guild’s Talld, which is a solid lawyer for authors and is accusing the Opena and Microsoft to apply for authors to their training training. (Because I cover the Tech companies, avoiding the votes involving cases for those companies.) Clearly, I speak today.

In the past, I have been a secret for the council, is actually torn to the magazine that companies have the right to train their models in legal proceedings. The argument that the personality of developing a large combination of human knowledge is truly revoking with me. When I interviewed Gresses singer in 2023, he expressed enthusiasm on the impact on this trial: “Oh, I’m sick, I can live forever!” He said. That’s up to me, too. Spreading my more awareness is a great reason I like what I do.

But embedded by a book within a large language model built by giant corporation is a different object. Remember that books are the most important Corpus of the most important Corpus model AI. Their length and coteers translate teachers of different people. The topics they cover are full and perfect. They are very reliable than menia media and give a deeper understanding than news articles. I might say that besides the books, large models of language would be weaker weak.

So one can say that Opelai, Google, Meta, Anthropic and the remainder must pay good for access to the books. Toward the end of the past month, in that pleasant time of White Heater Tech, fascinating CEOs Donald Trump on the combined investment sites at US data facilities. Apple promised $ 600 billion, and Meta said it would be like that money. Opena is part of a $ 500 billion organization called a star. Compared to those numbers, that $ 1.5 billion are killed by anthropic, as part of a residence, agreed to distribute the authors and publishers as part of a criminal offense.

Incorrect Use

However, the law may be on the side of those companies. Copyright law allows for a particular “Fair,” which allows the exploitation of books and negative titles based on several processes, whether the use of “convert” -It of the formation of the book in a new manner. The defective judge of the ANTROPIC law ruled that the use of legal statutory information on the training is a good use. To determine this is a strange exercise, because we deal with legal stairs under the Internet – let’s let ai.

Clearly, there should be a solution based on today’s conditions. The White House’s Aucter Plan announced this may not be one supply. But in his words with a plan, Trump survived the matter. In his view, scribes should not be paid – because it is very difficult to set a system that will well pay. “You may not have a successful Ai program when every one article, a book, or what else you have learned or to pay,” said Trump. “We appreciate that, but you just won’t do it – because it doesn’t.” (Administrative Source told me this week that the statement “sets up” for the official policy.)